Organic Trade

February 23rd, 2012

I was surprised last week when the United States and the European Union jointly announced that, from June 1, 2012, any product certified as organic in either place can be labeled and sold as organic in the other one. This is really amazing if you look at the history of food fights between Washington and Brussels. I mean, just think about the decades of trade bloodshed over growth hormones in beef, genetically-modified organisms, use of antibiotics in the food chain – and countless more. It often seems as if Europe and America can’t agree on anything to do with food. But now they do.

Accustomed to squabbling with each other, it seems that food experts on both sides of the Atlantic realized they had come up – independently – with near identical definitions for “organic” foods. You can check for yourself here for Europe’s rules – or here for America’s. There was a time when this realization would have prompted attempts to remake the definitions to exclude the other region’s products. But no longer.

The combined organics sectors in the United States and the European Union are a roughly $50 billion industry. And we are not just talking about your nearby farmer selling at a local market. Take a look at any grocery aisle (maybe not the snackfood aisle) and you will see products labeled as organic. The trade implications of such products moving freely across the Atlantic are immense.

This partnership connects organic farmers and companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a wide range of new market opportunities.” – U.S Deputy Agriculture Secretary Kathleen Merrigan.

… farmers and food producers will benefit from easier access, with less bureaucracy and less costs … it improves transparency on organic standards, and enhances consumers’ confidence and recognition of our organic food and products.” – EU Commissioner for agriculture & rural development Dacian Cioloş.

Of course, things aren’t quite so simple. Organic products still have to meet labeling requirements and require export documentation to prove they are organic. And there are some exceptions. U.S. growers are not allowed to ship crops produced using antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin for fire blight control in apples and pears). EU shippers can’t send animal products treated with antibiotics to the United States, either. Oddly, the EU can’t send fish or shellfish to the United States. The new requirements are here.

China: Nurturing a Culture of Secrecy & Corruption

February 22nd, 2012

Guest post by Jonathan Poston, M.E., Editor-in-Chief, LearnChinesebusiness.com

When the topic of China comes up these days, the first thing that comes to mind is a question as to when they’ll be the world’s number one economy. Then, as mere after-thoughts, are concerns over how China managed to win from the West the coveted crown of economic superiority. Was it intellectual property theft, corporate spy rings, communist government military-sponsored hacking, or some other furtive measure of social deviance which lent an advantage in a zero-sum game of supply and demand? Spy novel fodder aside, maybe it was because the Chinese know the value of “intelligence” and how to safeguard and exploit it. But this article isn’t about that: it’s about how the Chinese, as a cultural phenomenon, evolved a culture of business secrecy without ever considering how it might be leveraged in the business world.

In order to avoid approaching the subject with Western ethnocentricity or undo prejudice to write an article that could easily become more conjecture and presumption than fact, four mainland Chinese were interviewed to gain a more balanced and accurate view. The responses (which are combined in anonymous compilation below) indicate there are a number of societal triggers that actively nurtures a nation of secretive business leaders.

Lack of Trust

From a very young age Chinese people are taught not to trust others. It’s very common for Chinese to have to bribe officials or doctors just to ensure proper service.

“There is an old Chinese saying that we learned when we were young: we shouldn’t have bad intentions to hurt other people and their interest, but we should have protective intentions to protect ourselves from being hurt by other people, especially strangers. In our culture, interacting with people or making relations is an approval process. That means we presume any strangers that approach us have intentions that are detrimental to our interest. But once we get to know the person more and gradually find we can trust him/her, we would open up our heart. This is kinda typical in the Chinese business world. We become friends first then we talk about business. Americans are direct and open to whoever is interested in their business and is willing to collaborate, but once one side breaks his/her creditability, it will be very troublesome for him/her in the future – disapproval process [credit will be destroyed, etc.] In China, if you break your credit with one client, you just go to the next one and no one will ever know.”

Open Dialog Discouraged

It’s even been reported that students who speak out in an educational environment are considered strange or weird, and even punished by the teacher when they do it. This presumably stems from the teacher’s own fear of being challenged in class by his or her students, which may cause a loss of face when questions are asked that the teacher can’t answer. This dynamic also repeats itself in other situations where the authority figure (i.e. supervisors, investors, officials, etc.) discourages open dialog, the Chinese people have become very careful about talking when they shouldn’t.

Guan Xi

“No one gets inside without a strong relationship. First, in our culture, when you want to do business with someone, you have to make friends with him or her. We called it Guan Xi. It can be translated as personal connection. So eating and drinking multiple times before talking about business is a way to build up the initial relations — to prove you are someone I feel comfortable to do business with.”

Obtaining relational trust often means a great amount of drinking for both men and women.

“If you are willing to drink whatever amount of alcohol I want you to, you are a “good friend” and I feel like doing business with you. It might sound stupid, but that just seems the way it is in our culture. Unfortunately, women have to do the same…if you want to do the business.”

How long does it take to get Guan Xi?

“It all depends on how the business person you want to do business with feels during the interaction. It could be long, could be short. That’s probably the most frustrating part for a lot of western business people who want to do business with Chinese people.”

Authoritarian Government

Because strangers aren’t trusted (which includes people and organizations) and working relationships take so long to form, the western concept of transparency is a fantasy in China.

“But [we also have] no transparency because of the government too. We are pretty angry at them about covering everything too. Maybe [we’re] used to hiding things from authority, worried [that] those things [will] be punished by government, secretly.“

Naturally, the above factors (which don’t represent a comprehensive list) create a complex business environment for the Chinese and anyone working with them, while welcoming corruption at all levels. As Chinese business people become more educated, especially under Western educational models, the mental “bamboo curtain” is allowing exceptions to the conventional ways of doing business, thereby reducing the need for drinking to prove trustworthiness, bribery, etc. But the operative word to remember among this optimism is “exception.” Even so, every system is different, and for foreigners interested in doing business in China, it’s best to go in knowing the situation, and with a competent Chinese cultural expert close at hand to provide guidance as necessary.

A Long View of America’s Trade

February 21st, 2012

How many boxes in five years?

Five-year plans are boring, so it was with low expectations that I opened the FY 2012 – 2016 Strategic Plan for the Commerce Department’s International Trade Administration. I hoped to find clues about President Obama’s trade reorganization, but no. The plan is meant to appease budget people and can be summed up as saying we have done well, but intend to do even better. Fair enough. Move along, nothing to see here …

But there is something to see … and that is the opening discussion of trade and its impact on the United States in the 65 years since 1947.

By 2010, total merchandise trade was 240 times the level of 1950. In 1947, there were 23 founding members of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). … Today, there are 153 WTO members, accounting for 97 percent of world trade. The number of Regional Trade Agreements (RTA) has also grown considerably. The GATT had been notified of 123 RTA arrangements, and since the creation of the WTO, over 300 additional arrangements covering trade in goods or services have been notified.

During this same period, American trade has expanded 175-fold. The United States has seen higher incomes, improved standards of living, increased productivity, and job creation. Sixty years ago, the value of total U.S. trade (exports plus imports) was equal to 8 percent of U.S Gross Domestic Product (GDP); today trade is equal to almost one-third of our GDP.

See, things do change. We just live so close to it, we don’t notice. And we don’t internalize how important imports and exports are to our country.

– last year alone, the United States exported nearly $2 trillion worth of goods and services, and exports grew by 16.7 percent from the previous year. Perhaps most importantly, the U.S. workforce is dependent on global trade. Nearly 1 in 21 private sector jobs depend on manufactured exports. Services exports – including education, business services, information services, entertainment, international tourism to the United States, and construction and engineering – have also contributed to job creation. For example, recent estimates indicate that international travelers to the United States support roughly 1.1 million domestic jobs.

It’s not just trade. It’s investment, too.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) in the United States also contributes significantly to U.S. economic growth and prosperity. Output from U.S. affiliates accounted for almost 6 percent of total U.S. private sector output in 2008, 42 percent of which was in the manufacturing sector. FDI plays a vital role in supporting U.S. jobs and helping to bolster U.S. export competitiveness. For example, U.S. subsidiaries of foreign-owned firms accounted for 19 percent of all U.S. goods exports in 2007. In addition, U.S. subsidiaries of foreign-owned firms employed approximately 5.7 million U.S. workers in 2008, which accounted for 5 percent of the private workforce employment.

Now you know. Five-year plans aren’t all dull. They’re just made that way.